Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Ænglisc

 Language Learning Forum : Multilingual Lounge Post Reply
17 messages over 3 pages: 13  Next >>
Hampie
Diglot
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 6449 days ago

625 posts - 1009 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: Latin, German, Mandarin

 
 Message 9 of 17
27 October 2011 at 2:09pm | IP Logged 
Марк wrote:
Remster wrote:
Strange actually, even though the English language is simplified, their
spelling is more or less ''randomized''.

Why do you think it is simplified?

Course books and annotated and edited versions of Old English have had their spelling normalised. This is not the
case with the original documents where the spelling were highly irregular.
1 person has voted this message useful



Remster
Diglot
Senior Member
Netherlands
Joined 4595 days ago

120 posts - 134 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, English
Studies: German, French

 
 Message 10 of 17
28 October 2011 at 12:24pm | IP Logged 
I guess one could always find a reason to claim otherwise.
To stay on the safe side, it's just my opinion that grammar wise the language is simplified.


1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 4846 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 11 of 17
28 October 2011 at 12:56pm | IP Logged 
Remster wrote:
I guess one could always find a reason to claim otherwise.
To stay on the safe side, it's just my opinion that grammar wise the language is
simplified.


How many forms does a modern verb have in comparison with an Old English one?
Articles appeared, Continious tenses, Perfect tenses, Perfect Continious, many other
constructions. Modal verbs appeared, sentences became more complex. Passive voice
developed and became hard to grasp (I was given an apple. It sank = it was sunk). Word
order became stricter.


Edited by Марк on 28 October 2011 at 12:59pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Mauritz
Octoglot
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 4858 days ago

223 posts - 325 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, EnglishC2, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Turkish, Esperanto, French
Studies: Old English, Yiddish, Arabic (Written), Mandarin, Korean, Portuguese, Welsh, Icelandic, Afrikaans

 
 Message 12 of 17
28 October 2011 at 1:49pm | IP Logged 
OK then, let's solve this by simply stating that the morphology became simplified, which is what I think Remster is
talking about.
1 person has voted this message useful



Deerhound
Triglot
Newbie
England
Joined 4695 days ago

30 posts - 46 votes
Speaks: English*, German, Toki Pona
Studies: French, Mandarin, Esperanto, Greek, Latin, Welsh

 
 Message 13 of 17
28 October 2011 at 9:41pm | IP Logged 
I wish I could learn this beautiful version of our language, but there are so many declensions and conjugations that it would take more work than I am able to give it.
1 person has voted this message useful



akprocks
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5076 days ago

178 posts - 258 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German

 
 Message 14 of 17
29 October 2011 at 3:36am | IP Logged 
I have an old English text book in my basement, maybe it's time to give it another crack so I can join in on this conversation.
1 person has voted this message useful



Mauritz
Octoglot
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 4858 days ago

223 posts - 325 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, EnglishC2, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Turkish, Esperanto, French
Studies: Old English, Yiddish, Arabic (Written), Mandarin, Korean, Portuguese, Welsh, Icelandic, Afrikaans

 
 Message 15 of 17
29 October 2011 at 11:58am | IP Logged 
@Deerhound: Don't be afraid of inflectional languages! I see that that you've for example Latin, and I can tell you
that the declensions and conjugations of Old English are much easier than Latin. Verbs are only conjugated for two
tenses (present and perfect) and four persons (first, second and third singular as well as plural), accusative is very
rarely marked and there are many, many similarities between different declensions. It's really not that hard when
you get into it.

@akprocks: Hwelc gōd sāwole! Afæstla is þæt gōd gehygd! Ic hopie þæt þū dōn swā! Ænglisc is, and ic ǣr sægde
swā, swīþe wlitig sprǣc and þū lufast hīe hraðe.

Edited by Mauritz on 29 October 2011 at 12:35pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Deerhound
Triglot
Newbie
England
Joined 4695 days ago

30 posts - 46 votes
Speaks: English*, German, Toki Pona
Studies: French, Mandarin, Esperanto, Greek, Latin, Welsh

 
 Message 16 of 17
29 October 2011 at 10:32pm | IP Logged 
I thought there were lots of sub-groups of declensions and conjugations that complicated
things considerably?


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 17 messages over 3 pages: << Prev 13  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3594 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.